Update on Abortion Coverage Limitations: States Take Action

(Click here for full PDF version)

Update on Abortion Coverage Limitations: States Take Action

With the passage in 2010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and the individual mandate, which forces every American to purchase government-approved insurance plans or pay a penalty, came another mandate which many see as an unprecedented threat to their liberty.

Buried within the individual mandate is the “abortion premium mandate.”  This mandate requires that all who are enrolled in insurance plans which cover elective abortion must pay a separate premium which serves as a direct abortion subsidy.  This mandate could potentially leave many Americans stuck between a rock and a hard place as they must choose between following their consciences and providing for the healthcare needs of their families.

In March 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a final rule regarding the healthcare exchanges.  Despite the Hyde Amendment, the annual appropriations limitation which bars federal funds from being used to pay for most abortions, Section 1303 of PPACA prescribes a mechanism for plans that use a separate surcharge in order to cover elective abortions for each enrollee.  The surcharge can only be described to the customer during enrollment and the insurance plans may advertise the total cost of the plan while not making known the abortion charge.

The law requires that new exchanges be functional by January 1, 2014 for use by individuals, families and employers who can begin enrolling on October 1, 2014.  Now, however, the Obama Administration has relaxed the employer portion of the mandate, which requires companies of a certain size to provide coverage for all of their full-time (30 hours or more) employees under a plan that meets federal standards.  The individual portion of the mandate, which requires individuals and families to enroll in a qualified plan by the first of the year, has not been delayed, even though the majority of states have not established their own exchange and instead will be subject to a federally run exchange or a “partnership” exchange jointly managed by the state and federal government.

The overall effect of the law to date has been to increase costs, reduce the number of qualified insurers, and induce employers to limit worker hours or drop employee coverage altogether as a cost-containment measure.

Meanwhile, with these rules set in place and churning employer and individual options, a growing number of states are moving to bar abortion funding in their exchanges so that they can stop public dollars from being used to subsidize or extend coverage of abortion.  Twenty-three states have taken action as of September 2013 to prevent elective abortion from being included in plans offered via their exchanges.  Along with states that have prohibited abortion funding via Medicaid, or via state employee insurance and private insurance plans, these states are trying to insure that their rights as states and their citizens’ rights of conscience will be protected.

Because of state resistance, the role of federally financed exchanges, and so-called partnership exchanges, looms ever larger.  As of early September, key information regarding the insurance options that will exist in these exchanges has not been released by the Department of Health and Human Services.

In addition, the PPACA directs the federal Office of Personnel Management to negotiate contracts with at least two insurers to offer multi-state plans (MSPs) that will be available in every state exchange.  The law requires that at least one of these two plans exclude abortion coverage beyond the exceptions permitted under the annual Hyde amendment governing appropriations for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  Under the final rule governing MSPs issued by OPM on March 11, 2013, a multi-state plan may not offer coverage of non-Hyde abortions in any state where such coverage is prohibited under state law (currently 23 states).  Until HHS reveals details about MSP contracts in the other states, how the department will implement PPACA’s abortion rule remains unclear, although the prevailing opinion is that the Obama Office of Personnel Management is likely to include one or more MSPs offering elective abortions under the same secretive surcharge procedure outlined above.

As all of these issues converge, abortion coverage will no doubt continue to be a highly contested issue as each state attempts to apply PPACA to their system.  The new law and the liberty of the American people are in a precarious balancing act.  In an attempt to preserve their liberty, it is likely Americans will continue to call on their states and on members of Congress to take action in order to stop coerced funding of abortion via the new exchanges.

State Abortion Funding Limits

STATE Public Funding for   Indigent States Employee Insurance Exchanges Private Plans
Alabama X X
Alaska
Arizona X X
Arkansas X X
California
Colorado X X
Connecticut
Delaware X
District of Columbia X
Florida X X
Georgia X X
Hawaii
Idaho X X X X
Illinois X
Indiana X X
Iowa X
Kansas X X X X
Kentucky X X X X
Louisiana X X
Maine X
Maryland
Massachusetts X[1]
Michigan X
Minnesota
Mississippi X X X
Missouri X X X X
Montana
Nebraska X X X X
Nevada X
New Hampshire X
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina X X X
North Dakota X X X X
Ohio X X X
Oklahoma X X X X
Oregon
Pennsylvania X X X
Rhode Island X X X[2]
South Carolina X X X
South Dakota X X
Tennessee X X
Texas X
Utah X X X X
Vermont
Virginia X X X
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin X X
Wyoming X
TOTAL: 34 states prohibit public funding   of abortions for indigent women. 19 states restrict abortion   coverage in insurance plans for public employees.  23 states prohibit coverage in plans offered through the exchanges. 8 states have laws restricting insurance   coverage of abortion in private insurance plans.


[1] Specifically prohibits partial birth abortion.

[2] Permanently enjoined by court order

2 Comments on "Update on Abortion Coverage Limitations: States Take Action"

  1. Sarah Adams October 3, 2013 at 4:41 pm · Reply

    I completely support your efforts in stopping my money from funding abortions.
    Thank you for all your relentless hard work; it is greatly appreciated.
    May the Almighty GOD be with you continuously be with you.
    Sincerely,
    Sarah Adams

  2. Mr. & Mrs. Lloyd Schreiber October 4, 2013 at 8:31 pm · Reply

    We do not want our tax dollars to subsidize Obama Care. We do not want our tax dollars to pay for abortion. We ask for God to have mercy on our nation for what we have allowed to happen to his unborn children.

    Sincerely,

    Mr. & Mrs. LLoyd Schreiber

Leave a Comment

*