Russia’s Adoption Ban: A Crime Against Russia’s Most Helpless

Nora Sullivan  

Just before the New Year, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed into law a bill which bans the adoption of Russian children by U.S. citizens.  The bill was sent to President Putin’s desk following quick and almost unanimous passage in both houses of the Russian Parliament.

 

The decision made by the Russian government was in retribution to the recent U.S. Congressional approval of the Magnitsky Act, legislation that will impose sanctions on Russian bureaucrats entangled in human rights violations and prohibit them from owning assets in and traveling to the United States.

 

Responding to ban, Sen. John McCain issued a statement saying:

 

“The idea that this legislation is any way comparable to the U.S. Congress’s passage of the Magnitsky Act is utterly baseless. Our law singles out and punishes individual Russian officials who are corrupt and complicit in gross human rights abuses; Russia’s barring of adoptions broadly punishes the neediest, most defenseless, and most innocent members of its own society.”   

 

The banning of American adoptions seems to be an act of cruel and petty political power play.  Unfortunately the loser in this game is not the precious and fragile diplomatic relationship between two major international powers but the Russian children and the American parents who were hoping to welcome them into their homes.  If there is any positive gain to come out of this event, it is hoped that it will focus public attention and discussion onto the plight of facing many Russian children.

 

UNICEF, the branch of the United Nations which deals with the rights of children, estimates that there are currently about 740,000 children in Russia without parents.  The U.S. State Department notes that over the past twenty years 60,000 Russian children have been adopted by American families.  At least one third of Russian orphans currently reside in institutions and the number continues to rise.  Many children with special needs are placed in orphanages because of the social stigma attached to disability or because of their parents’ inability to care for them. A child with physical or developmental disabilities are often deemed uneducable and sent to state institutions where they receive no education, minimal therapy, and where the quality of care is often at a sickeningly substandard levelMany of the severely disabled children are confined to unsanitary warehouse style rooms, denied appropriate medical care, and, in certain cases, physically abused.

 

The tragedy of this situation is magnified by the fact that many foreign families have expressed an eagerness to adopt children with special needs.

 

The callousness of this act seems to reflect a serious disregard for the innate dignity of the human person.  As Russia currently has the highest abortion rate in the world (according to the United Nations estimates 53 out of every 1000 pregnancies in Russia end in abortion), it seems that this disregard begins right at conception. When a culture develops such a blatant disregard for life in utero, it often follows that the lives of the weakest become similarly disvalued.

 

The high abortion rate has so adversely affected the population in Russia, where abortion was entirely unrestricted since the beginning of the Soviet era, that the government recently enacted tighter abortion restrictions and has required that the health risks of abortion be included in abortion advertisements in order to boost the birthrate.

 

If Russia would like to be taken seriously on the international scene as a nation with a vested interest in protecting the human rights of its own citizens and, indeed, of others across the globe, a clear way to convey that message is to stop holding hostage the most vulnerable members of its population and begin to contribute to their growth and well being.

 | 

Sign up to receive email updates from the Charlotte Lozier Institute.