Use our account feature to register for a free CLI account. Your new account will allow you to bookmark and organize articles and research for easy reference later - making it simple to keep track of the research that's important to you!
Register / Sign in
close-panel

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

Get Notifications

Sign up to receive email updates from Charlotte Lozier Institute.

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide world-class research in defense of life.

DONATE

Charlotte Lozier Institute

Phone: 202-223-8073
Fax: 571-312-0544

2776 S. Arlington Mill Dr.
#803
Arlington, VA 22206

End of LifeLife & the Law

Assisted Suicide Effort Defeated in Connecticut

This past Friday, disability rights and others working against an effort to legalize assisted suicide in the state of Connecticut, were able to successfully stop the momentum of this bill for the rest of the legislative session.

 

Compassion and Choices, the pro-assisted suicide group pushing for the bill, sent a last minute email Friday pleading for at least an up or down vote on the measure.  However, as the panel took no vote, the bill died in committee and will not be brought up again for the rest of the session.

 

Legislators expressed concerns about whether this bill, which is expected to be resurrected in 2014, has enough safeguards to ensure that patients’ end-of-life decisions were not imprudently made.  State Sen. Jason Welch (R-Bristol) said he initially supported changing the bill to require multiple medical opinions and waiting periods but ultimately opposed the bill out of a concern that protections for the chronically ill were too few and too weak.

 

Connecticut’s Public Health Committee Senate Vice-Chair, State Sen. Gayle Slossberg (D-Milford), remarked, “There wasn’t enough support in the committee for a vote. It wasn’t even close… I think people have difficulty with a societal go-ahead for suicide and I think it’s a challenge for a lot of people.”  Sen. Slossberg added that she himself opposed the measure.

 

The loss in Connecticut must be quite a disappointment for assisted suicide advocates.  Proponents for assisted suicide seem to be targeting socially liberal Northeast states, as well as the Pacific Northwest, with these initiatives where it seems more likely that they will be well received.  In Massachusetts, a referendum to legalize it was defeated in 2012 following an extremely contentious fight.  Physician assisted suicide is also currently legal in Oregon and Washington.

 

Advocates for physicians assisted suicide argue that giving terminally ill patients the option of ending their lives is the most compassionate option and argue for its safety and ethicality. However, as pointed out by Dr. Jacqueline Harvey, physician assisted suicide can lead to unforeseen harm.  There is real concern that the legalization of physician assisted suicide can lead to the denial of palliative care coverage and adverse impact on the disabled.  Dr. Harvey also points out that there is a real worry about terminally ill patients being coerced into choosing suicide for financial reasons or convenience sake.

 

Additionally,   the American Medical Association has remained firm in its opposition to physician assisted suicide.  “Physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.”

 

The defeat of this bill in Connecticut and the referendum in Massachusetts is a great sign for advocates of the disabled and others concerned about the ethics of such legislation that even in states known for socially liberal policies- people realize the gravity of such policies. It is to be hoped that the American people continue to recognize this and discourage attempts to legalize this ethically problematic policy.  We must instead call for ever improving care for the terminally ill and recognize the dignity of every human person until their natural death.

Latest Posts

March 25, 2024 Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in Idaho’s Moyle v. United States EMTALA Case March 22, 2024 Fact Sheet: Three Problems with the FDA’s Abortion Drugs Complications Data March 21, 2024 Filed: CLI Amicus Brief in SCOTUS Case FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine

You Might Also Be Interested In

Washington State: Expanding Death Without Dignity

March 13, 2023
ClosePlease login
Lethal Non-Compliance with Washington’s “Death with Dignity Act”

Lethal Non-Compliance with Washington’s “Death with Dignity Act”

December 20, 2022
ClosePlease login
Studies Confirm: Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide Does Not Save Lives

Studies Confirm: Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide Does Not Save Lives

charlotte-lozier-institute Charlotte Lozier Institute
December 16, 2022
ClosePlease login

Become A Defender of Life

Your donation helps us continue to provide
world-class research in defense of life.

BECOME A PARTNER
cta-image